SIDRA Institute

SIDRA

Humanitarian Crisis in Sool: A Call for Action

On February 6, 2023, violence erupted in Lasanod town as clashes occurred between Somaliland forces and local forces following weeks of protests sparked after the assassination of Abdifatah Abdullahi Abdi, also known as Hadrawi, in late December 2022. Hadrawi, a local businessman, was among more than 120 prominent community members who have been targeted and assassinated by gunmen over the past thirteen years. The root of the tension in Lasanod can be traced back to 2007 when Somaliland forces gained control of the town, resulting in the withdrawal of the Puntland administration’s forces. The change in administration and subsequent withdrawal of forces played a significant role in shaping the dynamics of the ongoing tensions and conflicts in Lasanod (International Crisis Group, 2023). The protests took a dramatic turn when Somaliland responded with excessive force, resorting to live ammunition, resulting in the loss of approximately 15 lives, including children. The conflict also led to the arrest of over 100 people, thousands injured, and displacement of over 185,000 residents. Amnesty International found that Somaliland forces indiscriminately shelled the town, damaging hospitals, schools, and mosques. Many displaced people have lost their homes, means of subsistence, and even loved ones, living in overcrowded and unsanitary conditions. Six months into the conflict and the continuous bombardment of the town by Somaliland forces, the humanitarian assistance provided to the people escaping the conflict has been inadequate. The lack of support from Somali federal leadership and political complexities associated with the conflict have hindered the effectiveness of humanitarian efforts, including delivering food and shelter security and providing social services. SIDRA conducted a study to examine the humanitarian challenges faced by the broader population of Lasanod, with a specific focus on those who have been displaced due to the conflict. The study aims to elucidate significant areas of concern and present practical strategies to effectively coordinate substantive humanitarian aid for the civilians affected by the ongoing conflict.

Humanitarian Crisis in Sool: A Call for Action Read More »

Somalia’s Inter-governmental Relations Between The Constitutional Theory And Political Practice

The concept of Somali federalism has been gradually gaining some traction in the last few years. The idea of “two levels of government” or “Federal and State governments” was not initially popular with many people in Somalia who were used to unitary system of government, political and governance hierarchy and unilateral top-down decision making since independence in 1960.  Therefore, it was no surprise that the new political federal architecture presented many challenges to governing, coordination, decision-making and delivery of services. Somalia Provisional Federal Constitution (PFC) provides that exercise of federalism should be guided by principles of confidence and support of people, spirit of national unity, dialogue and reconciliation and subsidiarity (Article 50).  The founding principles of federalism in the light of the PFC informs that the federal model of Somalia should be based on vertical cooperation between the Federal Government of Somalia (FGS) and Federal Member States (FMS), rooted in broad-based collaboration, negotiation, and joint decision-making through formalized institutions and forums in the form of Intergovernmental Relations (IGR). IGR is enshrined in the PFC (Chapter 5, Articles 50 to 54).  The formalization of IGR in the PFC is unsurprisingly expected given the country’s jurisprudence which is largely based on civil law tradition but also underscores the importance of IGR in the adoption of Federalism and post conflict Somalia context in which the PFC was drafted. However, the formalization of IGR in the PFC did not translate into the formation of effective IGR institutions, legal frameworks and accountability and transparency strategies. In the last seven years, nascent IGR platforms without effective legal, institutional and administrative mechanisms mostly derived from political opportunism and donor demands for cooperation and resource sharing (aid money) have emerged, leading to numerous ad-hoc conferences and agreements between FGS and FMS.  The most prominent forum is the National Consultative Council (NCC) which has been acting as the highest executive IGR platform in Somalia and succeeded to convene and reach agreements on a number of exigent and contentious issues. But the forum has never been formalized in a primary legislation as instructed in the PFC (Article 51(5) nor was it institutionalized to effectuate its work. Not only has it been deficient of legal standing but most of the agreements hammered at the NCC have been treated as legally non-binding “political deals” and were never submitted to legislative scrutiny and approval at the Federal parliament. This policy review and analysis sought to examine Somalia IGR arrangements in the light of the provisions of the PFC, relevant legislations and inter-governmental agreements reached between FGS and FMS with comparative considerations. The challenges to IGR in Somalia could have been borne as the result of post conflict state building conundrums, and the limited resources and capacities of Somalia institutions but the following barriers have been highlighted as the main causes of the lack of effective institutionalized IGR in Somalia.

Somalia’s Inter-governmental Relations Between The Constitutional Theory And Political Practice Read More »

Pathways to care: IDPs seeking health support and justice for sexual and gender-based violence through social connections in Garowe and Kismayo, Somalia and South Kivu, DRC

This Paper was originally published on www.sciencedirect.com A growing literature documents the significant barriers to accessing care that Internally Displaced Persons (IDPs) face. This study focuses on gender-based violence (SGBV), an issue often exacerbated in times of forced displacement, and adds to extant debates by considering the wide range of social connections (pathways and actors) involved in providing care beyond the formal biomedical (and justice) system. This research asks, who do IDPs turn to following SGBV and why? How effective do IDPs perceive these social connections to be? To answer these research questions, the study used ‘participatory social mapping’ methodology for 31 workshops held with over 200 participants in Somalia and the Democratic Republic of the Congo in 2021/2022. Pathways to SGBV-related care for IDPs appear eclectic and contingent upon not only the availability and accessibility of support resources but also social, cultural and gendered beliefs and practices. ‘Physical’, mental health, and justice needs are intertwined. They are hard to decouple as many actors cut across need categories, including family, faith and aid organisations, and customary institutions. Comparing Congolese and Somali sites of displaced communities, we see significant similarities and overlaps in pathways to care. While both countries have experienced severe erosions of state capacity, NGOs and parallel faith-based and customary legal, psychological, and health systems have filled the state’s weakness to varying degrees of acceptance by IDP participants. A comprehensive understanding of the local milieu, which requires illuminating the logics behind where people actually turn to for care, is crucial for interventions supporting SGBV victims/survivors; indeed, they risk being inefficient if they only address barriers to formal systems.

Pathways to care: IDPs seeking health support and justice for sexual and gender-based violence through social connections in Garowe and Kismayo, Somalia and South Kivu, DRC Read More »

Health Alliance for Digital Development & Action (HADDA)

This project studies health management information systems in Somalia. We gather information on the availability of functioning systems in place, and identifiy needs for human and technical support. This will be used to implement a unified system for improved maternal and child health care. This project uses a participatory action research and multi-method approach to guide the integration of Somalia’s Health Management Information System (HMIS). It is divided into several phases. The first phase established a baseline for the programme. A needs assessment to identify the capacity needs for human and technical support was carried out in the selected regions in 2020–2021. The second phase focuses on process evaluation which entails systematic monitoring and evaluation of the design and implementation processes for the integrated HMIS in selected clinics in three Somali regions (Banaadir, Galmudug and Puntland). This phase will adapt an action and reflection cycle that will provide continuous feedback to the design and implementation process to ensure incremental improvement and risk management of the system. In the later stages of implementation, outcome evaluation will provide lessons learned in effective implementation, utilization and scale up of HMIS in Somalia. It will contribute towards the development of sustainability model for integrating HMIS in Somalia and beyond. This project is carried out by the centre SPIDER at the Department of Computer and Systems Sciences at Stockholm University, in collaboration with Somali research organisation SIDRA and technical partner KasmoDev. The HADDA project combines research and implementation. To achieve a cohesive HMIS, HADDA collaborates closely with the federal and regional Ministries of Health in the development of an integrated HMIS that is feasible for both member states and federal organisations. SPIDER has also engaged in collaboration and dialogue with WHO, UNICEF, the Swedish Public Health Agency and Somali National Health Institute. Read more about the project

Health Alliance for Digital Development & Action (HADDA) Read More »

RAISE

Vaccine-preventable diseases remain an important cause of disease and death among children in conflict-affected settings. Reaching children with vaccines in conflict settings is a complex undertaking, involving many autonomous global, national and local actors, and, often, limited governmental effectiveness in the crisis setting. As a result, decision-making around vaccination services often lacks structure and transparency. Through this study, we aim to better understand how decisions are made about vaccines for children in conflict settings, including: which vaccines, how and where to deliver them and to whom. Using the study findings, we intend to generate and disseminate recommendations to different stakeholders to improve equitable delivery of vaccines to zero-dose children in conflict-affected settings.  The multi-disciplinary team is made up of academics and practitioners from LSHTM, the SIDRA Institute Somalia, and the Public Health Training and Research Unit (PHTRU), Ahfad University for Women in Sudan. Find out more about RAISE

RAISE Read More »

COVID-19 Vaccine Rollout in Somalia: Experiences and Challenges in Fragile Context

The first case of the Novel Coronavirus (SARS Cov-2) in Somalia was confirmed on the 16th of March 2020[1] 5 days after the World Health Organization (WHO) declared the disease “a global pandemic”. As of 16 June 2021, Somalia reported 14,841 confirmed cases and 775 deaths[2]. The first wave of the infection lasted almost four months between mid-March 2020 and July 2020, with a weekly average of 173 confirmed cases and 5 deaths. The infection rate has risen sharply in the second wave between February 2021 and May 2021, with a weekly average of 553 confirmed cases and 36 deaths, an ominous signifier of more rapid spread of the infection and the loss of more lives than the previous wave in 2020. On the 15th March 2021, Somalia become one of the first 12 African countries to receive COVID-19 vaccine supply through the COVID-19 Vaccine Global Access (COVAX) Facility[1].  COVAX initiative is supported by WHO, GAVI, and the Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations (CEPI) to improve equitable access and distribution of COVID-19 vaccines around the world. It procures a supply of COVID-19 vaccines for low- and middle-income countries under the pooled procurement mechanism equivalent to inoculate twenty percent (20%) of their population. UNICEF, WHO, GAVI and other partners worked together to develop guidance, tools and training resources to support countries in assessing their readiness and planning to introduce and roll out COVID-19 vaccination. This study on the status of COVID-19 vaccine rollout in Somalia, assesses the existing opportunities and challenges to the COVID-19 mass vaccination and proposes policy options and recommendations to address the identified rollout gaps for COVID-19 immunization.

COVID-19 Vaccine Rollout in Somalia: Experiences and Challenges in Fragile Context Read More »

BREAKING THE SILENCE: A CONTEXTUAL ANALYSIS OF THE BARRIERS, LAWS AND POLICIES TO SAFE ABORTION FOLLOWING RAPE IN PUNTLAND, SOMALIA

Sexual violence is widespread in Somalia. Two decades of conflict and the collapse of the basic functions of government have brought about a system where women and girls, many displaced and living in IDP camps, are inherently vulnerable to rape and other forms of sexual violence. The systematic use of sexual violence and rape has been a common feature of conflict perpetrated by all actors involved. Abortion is permitted in Somalia only to save the life of the mother basing on the 2012 Provisional Constitution of Somalia, the Somalia Penal Code (Legislative Decree No. 5 of 16 December 1962) and the Somalia Essential Drug List, 2003. In practice, this can be interpreted loosely or strictly, according to level of privilege enjoyed within Somali society. Clan affiliation, family wealth, and links with religious institutions as well as structural factors like rural/urban, pastoral/home-based and level of poverty can dictate the extent to which this rule is enforced. The more vulnerable you are, the higher possibility that you will not be able to access safe abortion services. Sexual violence survivors are extremely vulnerable, and require immediate support in the aftermath of assault. In a country where emergency contraception is non-existent, abortion services are absolutely critical.

BREAKING THE SILENCE: A CONTEXTUAL ANALYSIS OF THE BARRIERS, LAWS AND POLICIES TO SAFE ABORTION FOLLOWING RAPE IN PUNTLAND, SOMALIA Read More »

THE DEATH KNELL FOR THE MIGHTY SOMALI SHILLING: The Causes and Effects of the Somali Shilling Depreciation and Currency Crisis in Puntland

The use of the Somali sovereign currency (the Somali shilling) has endured in spite of decades of conflict, state failure and fragility and the absence of a central bank in Somalia. The currency has experienced continuing depreciation and declining use due to a conglomeration of factors; the dollarization of the markets, the increasing use of mobile e-money and an influx of counterfeit money. The surprise recent rise in the exchange rate of Somali shilling to US dollar in Puntland, where it reached an all-time high of 46,000 SoSh per US dollar in November 2020, has caused concern among policy makers, businesspeople and the wider Somali public. SIDRA has conducted a research study in October – November 2020 to examine the available evidences on the causes of the current sharp decline of the value of the Somali shilling in Puntland, sings of inflation and the effects of this depreciation on the poor and low-income families, the State and the wider public. The study explored the underlying fiscal and monetary problems of the Somali shilling depreciation and briefly summarizes the difficulties faced by the monetary institutions such as the Central Bank of Somalia and Puntland State Bank to stabilise the local currency. The turbulent relationship and disagreements between the FGS and FMS over a raft of issues have eclipsed many important debates on peace and state building such as currency reforms. This study brings the debate over a new Somali currency to the fore and poses the question whether “the Somali shilling can withstand the multidimensional onslaught on its acceptability and value this time round?”

THE DEATH KNELL FOR THE MIGHTY SOMALI SHILLING: The Causes and Effects of the Somali Shilling Depreciation and Currency Crisis in Puntland Read More »

PREVENTING AND COUNTERING VIOLENT EXTREMISM IN SOMALIA: A MAPPING REPORT

The UN Security Council (UNSC) referred to preventing and countering violent extremism (P/CVE) for the first time in Resolution 2178 in September 2014. On February 2015, the US convened a three-day White House summit on CVE that discussed countering ISIS and violent extremism. In 2016, the UN Secretary General presented his action plan on preventing violent extremism to the General Assembly. These international efforts have also been complemented at the regional level with member states of the Intergovernmental Authority on Development (IGAD) seeking to be involved in CVE interventions. IGAD validated its Regional Strategy for Preventing and Countering Violent Extremism in 2017, which aims to provide a roadmap to guide the region in addressing violent extremism in a more collaborative and cooperative manner. Kenya has launched a National Strategy to Counter Violent Extremism and Somalia has developed a National Strategy and Action Plan for Preventing and Countering Violent Extremism. Other countries in the region are also working in their country-specific strategies. The Somali Institute for Development and Research Analysis (SIDRA) was commissioned to conduct this mapping study on P/CVE in Somalia. The study sought to produce evidence-based research that can be applied at the policy, programming and discourse levels to prevent and counter violent extremism in Somalia. The mapping study was carried out in five towns considered to have been adversely affected by AlShabaab radicalization and violent extremism: Kismayo, Baidoa, Mogadishu, Galkayo and Bossaso.

PREVENTING AND COUNTERING VIOLENT EXTREMISM IN SOMALIA: A MAPPING REPORT Read More »

Scroll to Top